| Abstract: | 臺中市BRT快捷巴士系統政策，是近年來最重大交通建設方案，卻在最短時間內因政黨輪替而終結，此項政策終結係很值得深入探討的個案。 本研究將以學者Sabatier and Jenkings-Smith 所提出的倡議聯盟架構(Advocacy Coalition Framework:ACF)理論，分析政策倡議者的理想，探討政策規劃過程，檢視政策執行初期績效，釐清政策反倡議者的改革方案，研析政府改革作為影響情況，比較政策反倡議方案提出後新措施績效，研判政策終結的因應措施民眾是否有感。從以上幾個面向，窺探政策形成、執行、初期績效、替代方案及終結之過程。 本研究發現，歸納為以下五點，分述如下：一、BRT政策形成符合理性漸進政策之模式。二、BRT政策施行初始，固有若干不周之處，唯其施行績效已於初期即有所呈現。三、BRT政策施行不及一年，即因新政府成立而廢止，有其略嫌草率不理性之處。四、新政府在交通改革措施上，尚有不夠周延且流於政治掛帥之嫌。五、比較兩黨的BRT政策施行，已顯示舊政府的穩健政策，正被激進的新政府所取代，其不符大多數人民之期待，且不合乎多數政策作為原則。 本研究提供之研究建議如下：一、地方政府對於諸如BRT重大政策，宜採取和平漸進的理性決策模式。二、地方政府固因選舉而有政黨輪替，但政策宜求穩定而持續推動，始符合永續發展的二十一世紀地方發展模式。三、政黨輪替而輕率變革重大交通政策，在發展中都會區為節省公帑，宜力求避免發生。
The policy of BRT(Bus Rapid Transit)express bus system for Taichung City is the most important transportation construction program in recent years, but it is ended in the shortest time due to the political party's rotation. The end of this policy is a case worthy of further discussion. This study will use the Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF) theory proposed by scholar Sabatier and Jenkings-Smith to analyze the ideals of advocators of policy, discuss the policy planning process, review the initial performance of policy implementation, and clarify the reform plan of anti-advocators of policy. The program analyzes government reforms as an influential case, compares the performance of new measures with the program proposed by anti-advocators of policy, and examines whether the public has any response to the termination of the policy. Based on these, we will examine the process of policy formation, implementation, initial performance, alternative solutions, and termination. This study is summarized as the following five points: First, the BRT policy forms a pattern that is consistent with a rational and progressive policy. Second, the initial implementation of the BRT policy, in spite of some unsatisfactory features, has been presented in the initial period. Third, the BRT policy has been implemented for less than a year; that is, it was abolished due to the establishment of the new government, and it was somewhat rash and irrational. Fourth, the new government has not been sufficiently thoughtful in terms of traffic reform measures, and political decisions trumped all other factors. Fifth, comparing the implementation of the BRT policies of the two parties has shown that the steady policies of the previous government are being replaced by the radical new government, which does not meet the expectations of most people and does not conform to the principle of most policies. The research suggesitons provided in this study are as follows: First, local governments should adopt a gradual and rational decision-making model for major policies such as BRT. Secondly, given the fact that the political party’s rotation takes place over elections, the policy had better be stable and continuous to be in line with the sustainable development of the local government in the 21st century. Third, in the developing metropolitan area political parties dramatic changes in major transport policies had better be avoided in order to save public funds. |
